Trends and timing of risk-reducing mastectomy uptake in unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers in Slovenia.

OBJECTIVES: Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is one of key prevention strategies in female carriers of germline BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPV). We retrospectively investigated the rate, timing and longitudinal trends of bilateral RRM uptake and the incidence and types of cancers among unaffected BRCA carriers who underwent genetic counseling at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana in Slovenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female BRCA carriers without personal history of cancer were included in the study. Clinical data on PV/LPV type, date of RRM, type of reconstructive procedure, occult carcinoma and histopathology results was collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 346 unaffected BRCA carriers (median age 43 years, 70% BRCA1, 30% BRCA2, median follow-up 46 months) who underwent genetic testing between October 1999 and December 2019, 25.1% had a RRM (range 35-50 years, median age at surgery 38 years). A significant difference in time to prophylactic surgery between women undergoing RRM only vs. women undergoing RRM combined with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was observed (22.6 vs 8.7 months, p = 0.0009). We observed an upward trend in the annual uptake in line with the previously observed Angelina Jolie effect. In 5.7% of cases, occult breast cancer was detected. No women developed breast cancer after RRM. Women who did not opt for surgical prevention developed BRCA1/2-related cancers (9.3%). CONCLUSION: The uptake of RRM among unaffected BRCA carriers is 25.1% and is similar to our neighboring countries. No women developed breast cancer after RRM while women who did not opt for surgical prevention developed BRCA1/2 related cancers in 9.3% of cases. The reported data may provide meaningful aid for carriers when deciding on an optimal prevention strategy.

Salpingectomy for the Risk Reduction of Ovarian Cancer: Is It Time for a Salpingectomy-alone Approach?

OBJECTIVE: To summarize published evidence supporting current strategies for the prevention of epithelial ovarian cancer in women with a genetic, elevated risk for the development of this disease, as well as the emerging data on the novel salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (SDO) strategy. Furthermore, we will explore whether salpingectomy alone is a viable risk-reducing strategy for these women. We will also discuss current national guidelines for risk-reducing surgery based on patients' individual genetic predisposition. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database, with a focus on randomized controlled trials and large prospective, observational studies. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: The key search terms for our review included Medical Subject Headings: "salpingectomy," "ovarian cancer," and "risk-reducing surgery." TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The fallopian tube is now well established as the site of origin for most ovarian cancers, particularly high-grade serous carcinomas. This finding has led to the development of new preventive surgical techniques, such as SDO, which may be associated with fewer side effects. However, until the results of ongoing trials are reported and the impact of SDO on ovarian cancer risk reduction is established, it should not be recommended outside of clinical trials, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy remains the treatment of choice for risk-reducing surgery, especially in women with a genetic, high risk for ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: The decision to undergo risk-reducing surgery among women with an elevated risk for ovarian cancer should be made after comprehensive consultation and individually based on genetic predisposition, childbearing status, and personal preference.

The rapid adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence for the role of distal fallopian tubes in the pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer has led to opportunistic salpingectomy being increasingly performed at the time of benign gynecologic surgery. Opportunistic salpingectomy has now been recommended as best practice in the United States to reduce future risk of ovarian cancer even in low-risk women. Preliminary analyses have suggested that performance of opportunistic salpingectomy is increasing. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in opportunistic salpingectomy in women undergoing benign hysterectomy and to determine how the publication of the tubal hypothesis in 2010 may have contributed to these trends. STUDY DESIGN: This is a population-based, retrospective, observational study examining the National Inpatient Sample between January 2001 and September 2015. Women younger than 50 years who underwent inpatient hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease were grouped as hysterectomy alone vs hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy. All women had ovarian conservation, and those with adnexal pathology were excluded. Linear segmented regression with log transformation was used to assess temporal trends. An interrupted time-series analysis was then used to assess the impact of the 2010 publication of the tubal hypothesis on opportunistic salpingectomy trends. A regression-tree model was constructed to examine patterns in the use of opportunistic salpingectomy. A binary logistic regression model was then fitted to identify independent characteristics associated with opportunistic salpingectomy. Sensitivity analysis was performed in women aged 50-65 years to further assess surgical trends in a wider age group. RESULTS: There were 98,061 (9.0%) women who underwent hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy and 997,237 (91.0%) women who underwent hysterectomy alone without opportunistic salpingectomy. The rate at which opportunistic salpingectomy was being performed gradually increased from 2.4% to 5.7% between 2001 and 2010 (2.4-fold increase; P<.001), predicting a 7.0% rate of opportunistic salpingectomy in 2015. However, in 2010, the rate of opportunistic salpingectomy began to increase substantially and reached 58.4% by 2015 (10.2-fold increase; P<.001). In multivariable analysis, the largest change in the performance of opportunistic salpingectomy occurred after 2010 (adjusted odds ratio, 5.42; 95% confidence interval, 5.34-5.51; P<.001). In a regression-tree model, women who had a hysterectomy at urban teaching hospitals in the Midwest after 2013 had the highest chance of undergoing opportunistic salpingectomy during benign hysterectomy (76.4%). In the sensitivity analysis of women aged 50-65 years, a similar exponential increase in opportunistic salpingectomy was observed from 5.8% in 2010 to 55.8% in 2015 (9.8-fold increase; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that clinicians in the United States rapidly adopted opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of benign hysterectomy following the publication of data implicating the distal fallopian tubes in ovarian cancer pathogenesis in 2010. By 2015, nearly 60% of women had undergone opportunistic salpingectomy at benign hysterectomy.

Fate of stable hips after prophylactic femoral varization osteotomy in patients with cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent prophylactic femoral varization osteotomy (FVO) for stable hips has been performed in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) undergoing hip reconstructive surgery for the contralateral displaced hip. However, there is currently a lack of studies investigating the outcome after the prophylactic FVO in stable hip. This study investigated the outcomes after FVO in stable hips with CP and influencing factors. In addition, this study compared the outcomes with those after hip reconstructive surgery in the contralateral displaced hip. METHODS: This study included 119 CP patients with 224 hips (80 stable, 144 displaced) undergoing hip reconstructive surgery including FVO. Migration percentage (MP), neck-shaft angle (NSA), and head-shaft angle (HSA) were measured through preoperative and follow-up hip radiographs. All hips were divided into the stable (MP ≤ 33%) and displaced hip groups (MP > 33%) according to the preoperative radiographs, and the annual changes in the radiographic indices after FVO were analyzed. RESULTS: In stable hip group, MP did not significantly increase over time (p = 0.057) after prophylactic FVO. In displaced hip group, MP significantly increased over time (1.6%/year, p < 0.001). MP was significantly decreased in cases of concomitant Dega pelvic osteotomy in both stable (14.5%, p < 0.001) and displaced hips (18.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic FVO in the stable hip in patients with CP showed good surgical outcomes, without a risk of hip displacement throughout the follow-up duration, while hip reconstructive surgery in the displaced hip was associated with a risk of increased hip displacement.

Impact of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in atrial fibrillation recurrence after a first pulmonary vein isolation procedure.

INTRODUCTION: PVI is a well-established therapy for patients with drug refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unclear whether prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation at the time of PVI improves long-term freedom from AF. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients who underwent PVI alone vs. PVI + prophylactic CTI ablation. METHODS: Propensity score (PS) matching analysis based on a registry dataset of 1931 consecutive patients who underwent a first AF catheter ablation. After excluding those with documented/inducible atrial flutter (n = 233), 1698 individuals were available for matching. Following adjustment for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, smoking, diabetes, LA volume, type of AF, and type of navigation (magnetic vs. manual), PS matched 411 patients who underwent PVI + CTI ablation with 411 receiving PVI alone. RESULTS: PS analysis yielded a study population of 822 matched patients (58 ±â€¯11 years, 69% males, 64% with paroxysmal AF). Over a median 2 years follow-up period there were 278 AF recurrences (34%). Survival free of AF (Log rank p = .965) and annual relapse rates were similar in the two groups - 10.9%/year vs 10.1%/year (PVI vs PVI + CTI, respectively, p = .97). CTI ablation remained unassociated with AF-free survival (HR 1.09, 95%CI: 0.84-1.41, p = .54) after Cox regression adjustment for age, sex, type of AF, LA volume, hypertension, diabetes, BMI and center. Female gender, current smoking, indexed LA volume and non-paroxysmal AF were identified as independent predictors of relapse after matching. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic CTI ablation at the time of a first PVI does not seem to improve long-term freedom from AF.

What Is New in Prevention of Ovarian Cancer?: Best Articles From the Past Year.

This month we focus on current research in preventing ovarian cancer. Dr. Schorge discusses four recent publications, which are concluded with a "bottom line" that is the take-home message. The complete reference for each can be found in on this page, along with direct links to the abstracts.

[Is hysterectomy nowadays an obsolete procedure?]. / Ist die Hysterektomie heutzutage ein obsoleter Eingriff?

After the general morbidity reduction at the beginning of the century and the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics, a hysterectomy was generously, sometimes to generously indicated in the middle of the 20th century. This might be one of the major reasons why the procedure got a bad reputation. Furthermore, in the last decade, several new treatments for benign uterine pathologies have been developed which can be proposed to the patients instead of performing a hysterectomy. Therefore, the question might be asked, if nowadays there are still some indications for a hysterectomy or if the procedure is obsolete.

[Changes in indications for surgery in the management of diverticulitis]. / Primum et super omnium: nihil nocere Operationsindikation im Wandel bei Divertikulitis.

Diverticulitis is a common disease in western countries and its incidence is increasing especially among young patients. Colonic diverticulosis, incidentally diagnosed by endoscopy or CT-scanning, has no immediate clinical consequences. Progression to diverticulitis develops in only 4 % of cases. In the last decades management of diverticular disease evolved and expectative treatment and less invasive techniques have gained importance. Elective resection has traditionally been advised after a second episode of diverticulitis or after a first episode if the patient was less than 50 years of age or complicated disease occurred. Recent changes in understanding the natural history of diverticular disease have substantially modified treatment paradigms. Elective resection in case of recurrent diverticular disease should be performed on a individual basis and in cases with complications like intestinal obstruction or fistulas. Primary anastomosis is an option even in emergency surgery due to colonic perforation, while diverting operations are indicated for selected patient groups with a high risk profile. Several prospective studies showed good results for laparoscopic drainage and lavage in the setting of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis, though this concept needs to be controlled with randomized clinical trials before application into the daily practice. This article should provide a short overview of trends in the surgical treatment of diverticulitis, help to understand the natural history of the disease and thereby explain the currently lower frequency of surgical interventions for diverticulitis.